Who needs HIPAA security awareness training, and how often?
HIPAA's training requirement applies to every member of a covered entity's workforce. Here is who that includes, what the regulation actually says, and how to document compliance for an audit.

The HIPAA Security Rule contains a training requirement that is easy to misunderstand. It is not optional, it is not just for IT staff, and it is not a one-time event. Every member of a covered entity's workforce must receive security awareness training, and it must happen periodically. Here is what that actually means.
Who counts as "workforce" under HIPAA
The regulation uses the word "workforce" deliberately and broadly. It includes employees, volunteers, trainees, and anyone else whose conduct is under the direct control of the covered entity, whether or not they are paid. This means:
- All clinical staff, from physicians to medical assistants
- All administrative staff, including receptionists and billing personnel
- All IT and security staff
- Volunteers and students who have access to systems or facilities
- Contractors and business associates who work on-site and use your systems
If someone can access protected health information (PHI), even incidentally, they need training.
What the regulation actually says
45 CFR §164.308(a)(5) states that a covered entity must "implement a security awareness and training program for all members of its workforce (including management)." The rule requires both implementation and documentation. It does not specify an exact frequency, but annual training is the widely accepted standard and what most organizations implement.
What the training must cover
HIPAA does not provide a detailed curriculum. It expects the training to be appropriate to the workforce member's role and responsibilities. At minimum, every employee should understand: what PHI is and why it matters; the organization's security policies and procedures; how to report suspected security incidents; password and access control requirements; and the consequences of non-compliance. Role-specific training may also be needed for those with elevated access.
How often is "periodically"
HIPAA uses the word "periodically" rather than "annually," but annual training has become the de facto standard because it aligns with other frameworks and audit expectations. Many organizations also conduct refresher training after security incidents, policy changes, or when new threats emerge. The key is to be able to show a consistent program with documented dates.
What auditors and examiners look for
During a HIPAA audit or Office for Civil Rights investigation, the reviewer will typically ask for: a list of all workforce members who received security awareness training; dates of training completion; the topics covered; evidence of completion, such as certificates or signed acknowledgments; and the training materials themselves. If you cannot produce this documentation quickly, it raises red flags regardless of how good your actual training is.
How to satisfy the requirement efficiently
The most efficient approach is a standardized, documented program that covers all required topics, delivers training to every workforce member, and automatically generates completion records and certificates. This is exactly what the Simple Training Center platform does: one annual subscription, automated enrollment, individual certificates, and an audit-ready completion report.
Related reading
All articlesWritten by
The Simple Training Center Team
We build and run Simple Training Center. These articles come from our work making compliance and security training practical for small and mid-size teams. No guest posts, no fluff.
More from the teamPut it into practice
Reading is step one. Training is what keeps you compliant.
Turn these insights into action. Our role-based security training takes minutes to set up and gives every learner a verifiable certificate of completion.
More in Regulations

Global AI regulation in 2026: Convergence, divergence, and the literacy requirement every country shares

AI regulation went local: What the wave of US state AI laws in 2026 means for governance and literacy
